{"id":960,"date":"2017-06-19T05:35:05","date_gmt":"2017-06-19T13:35:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/?p=960"},"modified":"2017-06-19T06:40:06","modified_gmt":"2017-06-19T14:40:06","slug":"i-know-what-you-shouldnt-have-done-last-summer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/i-know-what-you-shouldnt-have-done-last-summer\/","title":{"rendered":"I Know What You Shouldn&#8217;t Have Done Last Summer"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p>Rachel R. Romeo, Joanna A. Christodoulou, Kelly K. Halverson, Jack Murtagh, Abigail B. Cyr, Carly Schimmel, Patricia Chang, Pamela E. Hook, John D.E. Gabrieli. Socioeconomic Status and Reading Disability: Neuroanatomy and Plasticity in Response to Intervention. <em>Cerebral Cortex<\/em>, 2017; 1 DOI: <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1093\/cercor\/bhx131\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">10.1093\/cercor\/bhx131<\/a>\u00a0(paywall)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I admit that the opening paragraph of <a href=\"http:\/\/news.mit.edu\/2017\/socioeconomic-background-dyslexia-linked-reading-improvement-0612\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the MIT press release<\/a>\u00a0last week for this new study of reading \u201cdisabilities\u201d and the brain put me in a sour mood even before I read the journal article (graciously supplied to me by the lead author). It began by claiming that \u201c20 percent of children in the United States have difficulty learning to read.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/pareonline.net\/getvn.asp?v=6&amp;n=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">utter bunk<\/a>, as I pointed out 20 years ago in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Literacy-Crisis-False-Claims-Solutions\/dp\/0325000638\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Literacy Crisis<\/a><\/em> (movie rights still available!).<\/p>\n<p>The university&#8217;s PR department was no doubt just looking for a good hook for the story, and perhaps trying to bury the lede in what turned out to be a pretty disappointing set of results for systematic phonics instruction (the <a href=\"http:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1177\/0022219415617163\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">main report<\/a> on the project was published a bit earlier this year).<\/p>\n<p>A group of six- to nine-year-olds (N = 40) spent part of their summer vacation going four hours a day, five days a week, for six weeks to a &#8220;reading intervention.&#8221; The lucky little ones\u00a0got to experience the Lindamood-Bell program called &#8220;Seeing Stars.&#8221;\u00a0It was a bit like a trip to Hollywood Boulevard, except instead of seeing the Walk of Fame and taking selfies in front of Grauman&#8217;s Theater, they got a &#8220;multisensory remedial approach with a primary focus on training orthographic and phonological processing to improve reading accuracy, fluency, and comprehension&#8221; (p. 4).<\/p>\n<p>The children were tested in four different reading &#8220;subskills,&#8221; which consisted basically of pronouncing nonsense words and identifying words on isolated lists. They were not tested on, you know, <a href=\"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/this-week-in-language-education-may-12-2017\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">actual\u00a0reading comprehension<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>These &#8220;subskill&#8221; and &#8220;component&#8221; assessments are ones that students who get intensive systematic phonics instruction often do pretty well on. Phonics can be great for individual word recognition and sounding out <a href=\"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/spelling-nonsense-words-requires-rules-useful-in-spelling-nonsense-words\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">nonsense words<\/a>, but not so much for actually reading something and making sense of it.<\/p>\n<p>The children&#8217;s performance was tested before and after the intervention, and compared to another group of &#8220;waiting controls&#8221; (their turn came during the second half of the summer). The intervention &#8220;worked&#8221; in the sense that on three of the four not-actually-reading reading measures, the treatment group did significantly better than the control group. On one measure, there was no difference.<\/p>\n<p>But saying they did significantly better doesn&#8217;t mean they actually improved. In fact, what happened was that the treatment group <em>didn&#8217;t get any worse<\/em> over the summer, while the controls did. They avoided the &#8220;summer slump.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Given the children got 120 hours of small group (one teacher for every three to five kids) instruction, <strong>making absolutely no gains at all on average<\/strong> should be at least slightly disappointing, especially when the measures were about the only ones this kind of instruction can ever seem to effect. I&#8217;d ask for a refund.<\/p>\n<p>The press release for the study spends a lot of time talking about how the low-SES children responded better to the treatment than the high-SES group, all backed up by some nifty-looking brain scans. That&#8217;s all very interesting, but somewhat beside the point if you were one of the 50% of the children whose scores didn&#8217;t improve at all.<\/p>\n<p>One of the researchers is quoted is saying that &#8220;We&#8217;re taking [the children] on a neuroanatomical detour that seems to go with real gains in reading ability.&#8221; If by &#8220;detour&#8221; you mean going round and round in circles, then that seems about right.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rachel R. Romeo, Joanna A. Christodoulou, Kelly K. Halverson, Jack Murtagh, Abigail B. Cyr, Carly Schimmel, Patricia Chang, Pamela E. Hook, John D.E. Gabrieli. Socioeconomic Status and Reading Disability: Neuroanatomy and Plasticity in Response to Intervention. Cerebral Cortex, 2017; 1 DOI: 10.1093\/cercor\/bhx131\u00a0(paywall) I admit that the opening paragraph of the MIT press release\u00a0last week for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/960"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=960"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/960\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":995,"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/960\/revisions\/995"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=960"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=960"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/backseatlinguist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}